BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//JPOSS - ECPv6.13.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:JPOSS
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://jposs.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for JPOSS
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20220313T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20221106T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20220609T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20220609T210000
DTSTAMP:20260424T133338
CREATED:20220513T140714Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220606T130912Z
UID:762-1654804800-1654808400@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Yujin Woo (Hitotsubashi University)\, Jaehyun Song (Kansai University)\, "Nationally Prioritized Migrant Groups and Public Reaction: Evidence from Framing and Conjoint Experiments in East Asia"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. EDT: June 9 (Thu)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: June 10 (Fri)\, 9 – 10 AM \nNOTE: Registration required! Link. \nPaper is available here. \nAbstract: \nThe government frequently iterate their positions and preferences before its people to win their support. This paper investigates whether the repetitive government messages that prioritize certain migrant groups yield any impact on public perception of migrants. According to cognitive psychology literature\, message repetition can positively influence the recipients’ opinions (truth effect) while overexposure can lead to the opposite (reactance). To assess these contradictory effects in the context of migration\, we fielded online survey in Japan and South Korea (2020-2021) based on framing and conjoint experiments. The statistical analyses display nuanced interpretations. The respondents in both countries revealed similar preferences over migrant characteristics\, such as gender\, age\, education level\, and skill level. However\, they did not react\, either positively or negatively\, to supposedly familiar government statements. Instead\, they reacted more strongly and positively to a statement where the government proposed to prioritize somewhat uncommon or irregular migrant group. This finding seems to suggest people’s tendency to follow country-level information when they cannot evaluate the impact of certain policies or issues. In addition\, the structure of integration seems to matter. The Korean respondents exhibited greater preference toward the idea of naturalization\, which is generally associated with a provision of full rights as legitimate members of the society. \nPresenter: Yujin Woo (Hitotsubashi University). \nDiscussants: Charles Crabtree (Dartmouth College)\, Kikuko Nagayoshi (University of Tokyo). \nChair: Phillip Y. Lipscy (University of Toronto).
URL:https://jposs.org/event/woo-6-9-2022/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20220616T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20220616T100000
DTSTAMP:20260424T133338
CREATED:20220525T155109Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220601T142621Z
UID:779-1655370000-1655373600@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Jochen Rehmert (University of Zurich)\, Naofumi Fujimura (Kobe University)\, "Ideological Positions and Committee Chair Appointments"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. EDT: June 16 (Thu)\, 9 – 10 AM \nJST: June 16 (Thu)\, 10 – 11 PM \nNOTE: Registration required! Link. \nPaper is available here. \nAbstract: \nCommittee chairs hold crucial positions in the legislative process and can push or quell legislative initiatives. While extant studies examine the formal powers and legislative consequences of committee chairs\, we know less about their appointment. We examine who ruling parties (principal) appoint to committee chairs (agent) in order to minimize the risk of policy moving away from government positions. Using data from Japan (2003 to 2017) we test expectations derived from the principal-agent framework\, conditional on committee type. Japan makes an ideal case to study intra-party chair appointments due to its coalitions’ office allocation patterns. We find that cabinets appoint as chairs ideologically close MPs to committees with jurisdiction on high and foreign policy. However\, we find no effect for chair appointments on particularistic committees. Our findings are robust across cabinets\, parties and variation in committee classifications. These findings contribute to our understanding of political appointments and legislative processes. \nPresenter: Jochen Rehmert (University of Zurich). \nDiscussants: Benjamin Nyblade (UCLA School of Law)\, Yoshikuni Ono (Waseda University). \nChair: Amy Catalinac (New York University).
URL:https://jposs.org/event/rehmert-6-16-2022/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR