BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//JPOSS - ECPv6.13.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://jposs.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for JPOSS
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20210314T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20211107T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20220313T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20221106T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20230312T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20231105T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20240310T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20241103T060000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20250309T070000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20251102T060000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20211202T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20211202T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20211116T150121Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20211201T203453Z
UID:636-1638475200-1638478800@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Pinar Temocin (Hiroshima University)\, "Rethinking Environmental Mobilization: Civic Engagement in Post Fukushima Japan"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. EST: December 2 (Thu)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: December 3 (Fri)\, 10 – 11 AM \nNOTE: Registration required! Link. \nPaper can be found here. \nAbstract: \nThis study focuses on the interaction between environmental civil society organizations (ECSOs) and the Japanese state to find out how these actors have framed\, articulated\, and interpreted their goals for a nuclear-free policy and sustainable energy realities in the post-Fukushima era (3/11). It analyzes the extent to which environmental civil society actors have been influential in the energy decision-making process since 3/11.   \nIt highlights the socio-political dimensions of nuclear energy issue including the efficacy level of ECSOs\, the degree of functionality of governance\, the interaction between vertical and horizontal dimensions of state-civil society partnership\, and the dynamics of energy policy formation\, implementation and development in contemporary Japan. It aims to play a reflective role on the nexus of energy politics\, deliberative environmentalism\, collective behavior. \nPresenter: Pinar Temocin (Hiroshima University). \nDiscussants: Mary Alice Haddad (Wesleyan University)\, Yasuo Takao (Curtin University). \nChair: Phillip Y. Lipscy (University of Toronto).
URL:https://jposs.org/event/temocin-12-2-2021/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20220113T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20220113T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20211118T144307Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220104T194746Z
UID:641-1642104000-1642107600@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Ryan Scoville (Marquette University Law School)\, "Official Knowledge of Foreign Relations Law in U.S.-Japan Relations"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. EST: January 13 (Thu)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: January 14 (Fri)\, 10 – 11 AM \nNOTE: Registration required! Link. \nPaper can be found here. \nAbstract: \nArguments in the field of U.S. foreign relations law typically proceed from the inside out: legal actors focus on internal (domestic) sources of authority to reach conclusions with significant external (international) implications. The text and structure of the Constitution\, case law\, legislative intent\, assessments of institutional competency\, and historical practice thus dominate debates about treaty-making\, war powers\, diplomatic authorities\, and related matters. This tendency reflects generic assumptions about the proper modalities of legal analysis and helps to ensure that the law reflects national values. \nYet inside-out arguments overlook a critical fact: the practical merits of U.S. foreign relations law often depend on whether and how this law is understood abroad. In other words\, the nature and extent of foreign governmental knowledge of U.S. foreign relations law significantly affect the law’s ability to advance U.S. national interests\, but there is neither theoretical nor empirical scholarship on the stakes or condition of such knowledge. Nor are there official U.S. policies to ascertain or account for this form of foreign knowledge. In these circumstances\, American legal actors cannot fully apprehend whether the law is well designed and applied to achieve its purposes. \nThis Article elaborates on these issues to develop an “outside in” approach to U.S. foreign relations law. The Article begins by explaining the value of meta-knowledge—domestic knowledge of foreign knowledge of U.S. foreign relations law. The Article then uses original empirical research to generate meta-knowledge. That research includes an immersive case study on Japan\, where I collected academic publications\, searched newspaper archives\, obtained government records under Japan’s freedom-of-information act\, and interviewed dozens of scholars and government officials to triangulate Japanese understandings of U.S. foreign relations law. The Article concludes by laying out an agenda to cultivate additional meta-knowledge\, reevaluate the law’s practical merits in light of epistemic conditions\, and optimize foreign sophistication through legal and policy reforms.  \nPresenter: Ryan Scoville (Marquette University Law School). \nDiscussants: Kevin Cope (University of Virginia School of Law)\, Andrew Oros (Washington College). \nChair: Charles Crabtree (Dartmouth College).
URL:https://jposs.org/event/scoville-1-13-2022/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20220127T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20220127T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20220111T213140Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220120T210039Z
UID:671-1643313600-1643317200@jposs.org
SUMMARY:"Field Research When There’s Limited Access to the Field: Lessons From Japan"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. EST: January 27 (Thu)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: January 28 (Fri)\, 10 – 11 AM \nNOTE: Registration required! Link. \nPaper can be found here. \nCo-authors: \n\nKenya Amano (University of Washington)\nMelanie Sayuri Dominguez (University of New Mexico)\nTimothy Fraser (Northeastern University)\nEtienne Gagnon (University of Tokyo)\nTrevor Incerti (Yale University)\nJinhyuk Jang (Pennsylvania State University)\nCharles T. McClean (University of Michigan)\nAustin M. Mitchell (Tohoku University)\nSayumi Miyano (Princeton University)\nColin Moreshead (Yale University)\nHarunobu Saijo (Duke University)\nDiana Stanescu (Stanford University)\nAyumi Teraoka (Princeton University)\nHikaru Yamagishi (Yale University)\nCharmaine N. Willis (University at Albany\, State University of New York)\nYujin Woo (Waseda University)\nCharles Crabtree (Dartmouth College)\n\nChair: Daniel M. Smith (Columbia University).
URL:https://jposs.org/event/1-27-2022/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20220210T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20220210T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20220104T150436Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220204T181422Z
UID:661-1644523200-1644526800@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Shusei Eshima (Harvard University)\, Yusaku Horiuchi (Dartmouth College)\, Shiro Kuriwaki (Stanford University/Yale University)\, Daniel M. Smith (Columbia University)\, "Winning Elections with Unpopular Policies: Understanding Single-Party Dominance in Japan"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. EST: February 10 (Thu)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: February 11 (Fri)\, 10 – 11 AM \nNOTE: Registration required! Link. \nAbstract: \nSpatial theories of electoral competition assume that parties win votes by proposing popular policies. Other theories suggest the relevance of voters’ non-policy—or valence—considerations. To what extent do voters make their choices based on policies versus valence? We examine this fundamental question about electoral competition using the case of Japan—a multi- party democracy with a single dominant party\, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). Specifically\, we develop a novel measure of multidimensional policy preferences based on conjoint experiments fielded during the 2017 and 2021 House of Representatives elections\, and relate this measure to voting intentions. We find that voters’ policy preferences are positively associated with their choices. At the same time\, our analysis reveals that the LDP enjoys a strong valence advantage despite proposing policies that are\, on the whole\, less popular among voters. These findings speak to longstanding questions of electoral competition and (non-)policy voting in multidimensional issue spaces\, and help to explain the continued dominance of the LDP. \nPresenters: Shusei Eshima (Harvard University)\, Yusaku Horiuchi (Dartmouth College)\, Shiro Kuriwaki (Stanford University/Yale University)\, Daniel M. Smith (Columbia University). \nDiscussants: Eric Guntermann (University of California\, Berkeley)\, Chris Tausanovitch (University of California\, Los Angeles). \nChair: Amy Catalinac (New York University).
URL:https://jposs.org/event/eshima-2-10-2022/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20220303T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20220303T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20220104T150847Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220225T153549Z
UID:663-1646337600-1646341200@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Masaaki Higashijima (Tohoku University)\, Naoki Shimizu\, Hidekuni Washida\, Yuki Yanai\, "Mass Reactions to Endogenous Election Timing: Evidence from Conjoint Experiments in Japan"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. EST: March 3 (Thu)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: March 4 (Fri)\, 10 – 11 AM \nNOTE: Registration required! Link. \nPaper is available here. \nAbstract: \nThis paper explores when election timing maneuvering undermines procedural fairness of democratic elections. In parliamentary democracies\, incumbents opportunistically time elections. In theorizing about how election timing manipulation affects mass perceptions of electoral fairness\, we focus on structures of electoral competition. Besides conventional economic opportunism\, we consider the following three factors – (1) cabinet support\, (2) opposition coordination\, and (3) individual partisanship – as moderators influencing mass reactions to election timing. A conjoint experiment conducted in Japan shows that election timing chicanery negatively affects popular perceptions of democratic fairness among independents\, particularly when surrounding structures of the electoral field credibly signals election calling is pro-incumbent\, i.e.\, when public support for the government is high and opposition parties fail to coordinate election campaigning. In contrast\, government and opposition supporters are less sensitive to timing manipulation and positively evaluate electoral circumstances where their supporting parties have advantages in the first place. \nPresenter: Masaaki Higashijima (Tohoku University). \nDiscussants: Sona N. Golder (Pennsylvania State University)\, Charles McClean (University of Michigan). \nChair: Yusaku Horiuchi (Dartmouth College).
URL:https://jposs.org/event/higashijima-3-3-2022/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20220414T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20220414T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20220301T161402Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220301T171730Z
UID:738-1649966400-1649970000@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Remembering Frances Rosenbluth: Scholar\, Mentor\, and Friend
DESCRIPTION:U.S. EDT: April 14 (Thu)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: April 15 (Fri)\, 9 – 10 AM \nNOTE: Registration required. \nLast November\, we lost a brilliant scholar\, inspirational mentor\, and generous friend. She was one of the founding members of the Japanese Politics Online Seminar Series (JPOSS). In this session\, we will gather together to honor and remember Professor Rosenbluth’s contributions to political science\, with a focus on her work on Japanese politics\, political institutions\, and political economy. \nRafaela Dancygier\, Tarek Masoud\, Tom Pepinsky and Dawn Teele. “Frances McCall Rosenbluth\, a Yale University scholar\, understood Japanese politics and so much more.” The Washington Post\, January 4\, 2022.
URL:https://jposs.org/event/rosenbluth-4-14-2022/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20220609T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20220609T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20220513T140714Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220606T130912Z
UID:762-1654804800-1654808400@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Yujin Woo (Hitotsubashi University)\, Jaehyun Song (Kansai University)\, "Nationally Prioritized Migrant Groups and Public Reaction: Evidence from Framing and Conjoint Experiments in East Asia"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. EDT: June 9 (Thu)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: June 10 (Fri)\, 9 – 10 AM \nNOTE: Registration required! Link. \nPaper is available here. \nAbstract: \nThe government frequently iterate their positions and preferences before its people to win their support. This paper investigates whether the repetitive government messages that prioritize certain migrant groups yield any impact on public perception of migrants. According to cognitive psychology literature\, message repetition can positively influence the recipients’ opinions (truth effect) while overexposure can lead to the opposite (reactance). To assess these contradictory effects in the context of migration\, we fielded online survey in Japan and South Korea (2020-2021) based on framing and conjoint experiments. The statistical analyses display nuanced interpretations. The respondents in both countries revealed similar preferences over migrant characteristics\, such as gender\, age\, education level\, and skill level. However\, they did not react\, either positively or negatively\, to supposedly familiar government statements. Instead\, they reacted more strongly and positively to a statement where the government proposed to prioritize somewhat uncommon or irregular migrant group. This finding seems to suggest people’s tendency to follow country-level information when they cannot evaluate the impact of certain policies or issues. In addition\, the structure of integration seems to matter. The Korean respondents exhibited greater preference toward the idea of naturalization\, which is generally associated with a provision of full rights as legitimate members of the society. \nPresenter: Yujin Woo (Hitotsubashi University). \nDiscussants: Charles Crabtree (Dartmouth College)\, Kikuko Nagayoshi (University of Tokyo). \nChair: Phillip Y. Lipscy (University of Toronto).
URL:https://jposs.org/event/woo-6-9-2022/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20220616T090000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20220616T100000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20220525T155109Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220601T142621Z
UID:779-1655370000-1655373600@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Jochen Rehmert (University of Zurich)\, Naofumi Fujimura (Kobe University)\, "Ideological Positions and Committee Chair Appointments"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. EDT: June 16 (Thu)\, 9 – 10 AM \nJST: June 16 (Thu)\, 10 – 11 PM \nNOTE: Registration required! Link. \nPaper is available here. \nAbstract: \nCommittee chairs hold crucial positions in the legislative process and can push or quell legislative initiatives. While extant studies examine the formal powers and legislative consequences of committee chairs\, we know less about their appointment. We examine who ruling parties (principal) appoint to committee chairs (agent) in order to minimize the risk of policy moving away from government positions. Using data from Japan (2003 to 2017) we test expectations derived from the principal-agent framework\, conditional on committee type. Japan makes an ideal case to study intra-party chair appointments due to its coalitions’ office allocation patterns. We find that cabinets appoint as chairs ideologically close MPs to committees with jurisdiction on high and foreign policy. However\, we find no effect for chair appointments on particularistic committees. Our findings are robust across cabinets\, parties and variation in committee classifications. These findings contribute to our understanding of political appointments and legislative processes. \nPresenter: Jochen Rehmert (University of Zurich). \nDiscussants: Benjamin Nyblade (UCLA School of Law)\, Yoshikuni Ono (Waseda University). \nChair: Amy Catalinac (New York University).
URL:https://jposs.org/event/rehmert-6-16-2022/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20221006T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20221006T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20220924T130359Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20220926T184308Z
UID:822-1665086400-1665090000@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Reo Matsuzaki (Trinity College) and Fabian Drixler (Yale University)\, "The Politics of Omote and Naishō: Performative Compliance and Spaces of Impunity in Meiji Japan"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: Oct 6 (Thu)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: Oct 7 (Fri)\, 9 – 10 AM \nNOTE: Registration required! Link. \nPaper is available here. \nAuthors: Reo Matsuzaki (Trinity College) and Fabian Drixler (Yale University) \nAbstract: Around 1900\, at least 97 percent of homicide victims in Japan were newborn children. Official statistics obscured this fact by reporting only a handful of infanticides each year\, but they also preserved it in the guise of impossibly frequent stillbirths. We argue that this striking failure of law enforcement did not reflect insufficient state capacity\, but that this interaction is best understood as a performance of law-abidance\, jointly delivered by subjects and officials to reconcile two conflicting values—the omote (façade) of the state’s legal protection of newborns and the naishō (tacit arrangement) of household autonomy over family planning and reproduction. Political performances are often seen as acts of domination\, subversion\, or resistance enacted within a conflictual arena pitting state against society. We observe instead a more collaborative dynamic that allows states to extend their reach into society while also respecting the autonomy of the population through compromise and indeterminacy. \nPresenter: Reo Matsuzaki (Trinity College) \nDiscussants: Iza Yue Ding (University of Pittsburgh)\, Dan Mattingly (Yale University) \nChair: Charles Crabtree (Dartmouth College)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/matsuzaki-2022-10-6/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20221109T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20221109T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20221020T195512Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221103T231522Z
UID:845-1668024000-1668027600@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Christina Davis (Harvard University)\, Jialu Li (Harvard University)\, and Sayumi Miyano (Princeton University)\, “Following Peers and Competitors: How Business Managers Evaluate Firm Withdrawals from Russia”
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: Nov 9 (Wed)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: Nov 10 (Thu)\, 10 – 11 AM \nRegistration: Link. \nPaper is available here. \nAuthors: Christina Davis (Harvard University)\, Jialu Li (Harvard University)\, and Sayumi Miyano (Princeton University) \nAbstract:\nStates have long used economic sanctions in response to violations of international law as a strategy to restore order. Increasingly\, we also observe firms that reject doing business with violators. In response to the war in Ukraine\, hundreds of multinational corporations (MNCs) voluntarily withdrew from Russia\, even when policymakers were still debating the extent of sanctions. Why did private firms halt their business? We argue that peer pressure and competition generate a strategic interaction in the response of firms to international crises.  We test our hypotheses with a survey experiment on Japanese firm managers conducted during the first few months of the Russian invasion of Ukraine.   First\, we find that news about withdrawal by other firms creates peer pressure and increases support for firm withdrawal. Withdrawal by firms from a diverse range of countries has a larger impact. Second\, we find that news about some firms continuing business with the sanction target generates competition concerns and lowers support for firm withdrawal. Our research provides insight into why business actors take political stances during international conflicts. \nPresenters: Christina Davis (Harvard University)\, Jialu Li (Harvard University)\, and Sayumi Miyano (Princeton University) \nDiscussants: Kristin Vekasi (University of Maine)\, Rachel Wellhausen (University of Texas at Austin) \nChair: Yusaku Horiuchi (Dartmouth College)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/christina-davis-harvard-university-jialu-li-harvard-university-and-sayumi-miyano-princeton-university-following-peers-and-competitors-how-business-managers-evaluate-firm-withdrawals/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20221215T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20221215T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20221115T202231Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20221208T185122Z
UID:873-1671134400-1671138000@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Yusaku Horiuchi (Dartmouth College) and Atsushi Tago (Waseda University)\, "The Pretty Pragmatic Public: Japanese Public Opinion During the Afghanistan Evacuation"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: Dec 15 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: Dec 16 (Friday)\, 10 – 11 AM \nRegistration: Link. \nPaper is available here. \nAuthors: Yusaku Horiuchi (Dartmouth College) and Atsushi Tago (Waseda University) \nAbstract:\nAlthough the need for the U.S. to work with Japan during a future crisis is ever increasing\, we do not yet have a sufficient understanding of what Japanese citizens think about security policies and possible military actions. We leveraged on an extremely rare opportunity in which the Japanese government decided to dispatch its de facto military\, the Self-Defense Forces (SDFs)\, overseas for a high-risk operation\, the evacuation from Afghanistan in August 2021. Specifically\, we conducted “real-time” survey experiments in this context to test some hypotheses relevant to the theoretical literature on international relations: reliability of alliances\, civilian control\, and sensitivity to casualty. Furthermore\, we also fielded other survey experiments to examine Japanese people’s attitudes when they face various hypothetical crises. Our analysis suggests that Japanese citizens are “pretty pragmatic” in their opinions on foreign policy issues. We discuss nuanced differences in their attitudes compared to Americans’ attitudes\, which existing studies suggest as “pretty prudent” (Jentleson\, 1992; Jentleson and Britton\, 1998). \nPresenters: Yusaku Horiuchi (Dartmouth College) and Atsushi Tago (Waseda University) \nDiscussants: Shoko Kohama (Hokkaido University) and Jonathan Renshon (University of Wisconsin-Madison) \nChair: Amy Catalinac (New York University) 
URL:https://jposs.org/event/yusaku-horiuchi-dartmouth-college-and-atsushi-tago-waseda-university-the-pretty-pragmatic-public-japanese-public-opinion-on-self-defense-forces-and-security-policies/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230202T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230202T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20230118T210838Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230119T135756Z
UID:893-1675368000-1675371600@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Phillip Lipscy (University of Toronto)\, "Japan: The Harbinger State"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: Feb 2 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: Feb 3 (Friday)\, 10 – 11 AM \nRegistration: Link. \nPaper is available here. \nAuthor: Phillip Y. Lipscy (University of Toronto) \nAbout the session:\nIn this state-of-the-field community conversation\, Phillip Lipscy will begin by presenting his ideas and data from his recent essay\, “Japan: The Harbinger State\,” part of a special issue of the Japanese Journal of Political Science (JJPS) honoring Susan J. Pharr’s contributions to the study of Japanese politics. JPOSS faculty organizers and participants will respond and share their ideas about how they invoke Japan in their political science research and publication strategies. \nPresenters: Phillip Y. Lipscy (University of Toronto) \nChair: Christina L. Davis (Harvard University)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/phillip-lipscy-university-of-toronto-japan-the-harbinger-state/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230302T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230302T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20230214T200833Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230216T155527Z
UID:916-1677787200-1677790800@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Austin Mitchell (Tohoku University)\, "Show Me the Money: Explaining Fiscal Capacity Building in Late 16th Century Japan"
DESCRIPTION:  \nU.S. ET: March 2 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: March 3 (Friday)\, 10 – 11 AM \nZoom Registration: Link \nPaper is available here \nAuthor: Austin Mitchell (Tohoku University)\, Minzhao Wang (Peking University)\, and Weiwen Yin (University of Macau) \nAbstract:\nHow do rulers develop fiscal capacity in the process of state-building? In this paper\, we propose a mechanism for how rulers implement fiscal capacity building according to their incentives for revenue extraction. Specifically\, rulers prioritize implementing fiscal capacity building policies that can overcome the asymmetric information problem between central and local governments in areas where potential extractable revenue is large. We test the hypotheses using the context of late 16th century Japan where Toyotomi Hideyoshi implemented cadastral surveys (taiko kenchi) as an effort of state-building. Based on a panel of provinces between 1582-1598 in Japan\, we find that localities with larger potential output were the primary targets of the land surveys\, while neither involvement in the invasion of Korea nor opposition against Hideyoshi predict survey implementation. The results suggest that revenue extraction motivates how state-building is pursued to a greater extent than a locality’s exposure to external or internal competitions. \nPresenter: Austin Mitchell (Tohoku University) \nDiscussants: David Stasavage (New York University)\, Junichi Yamasaki (Kobe University) \nChair: Amy Catalinac (New York University)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/austin-mitchell-tohoku-university-show-me-the-money-explaining-fiscal-capacity-building-in-late-16th-century-japan/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230420T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230420T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20230404T141940Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230419T142432Z
UID:949-1682020800-1682024400@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Etienne Gagnon (University of Tokyo)\, "Good News or Bad News? Political Social Media Messaging During the Tokyo Olympics"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: April 20 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: April 21 (Friday)\, 9 – 10 AM \nZoom Registration: Link \nPaper is available here \nAuthors: Etienne Gagnon (University of Tokyo)\, Kenneth McElwain (University of Tokyo)\, and Yuya Shibuya (University of Tokyo) \nAbstract:\nSporting events that are unrelated to political competence can nevertheless improve politicians’ standing among voters. The impact of\nsuch cues rests on two assumptions: that voters view sporting events positively\, and that politicians seek credit for them. We examine\nthese linkages in a context where both assumptions may be violated: the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. The Olympics were politically divisive\, as\nthey were held amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly\, politicians may have hesitated from lauding Olympics achievements lest they be accused of downplaying Covid’s dangers. We examine this strategic dilemma through two types of analyses. First\, we conduct\ntopic clustering and sentiment analysis of politicians’ social media messages and show two patterns. Governing party (LDP) politicians\nengaged in quantitatively more\, and tonally more positive\, messaging during the Olympics. LDP politicians were also more likely to post\npositively about the Olympics when an athlete from their prefecture won a medal. Second\, we examine pre- and post-Olympics changes\nin public sentiment using multi-wave survey data. Those whose views towards the Olympics became more favorable were more likely to\nchange their party affinity to the LDP and to evaluate the prime minister’s handling of Covid positively. Overall\, our analysis suggests that despite the LDP’s tentative social media messaging about the Olympics\, the event itself seems to have borne political fruit. \nPresenter: Etienne Gagnon (University of Tokyo) \nDiscussants: Eunji Kim (Columbia University)\, Neil Malhotra (Stanford University) \nChair: Daniel M. Smith (Columbia University)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/etienne-gagnon-university-of-tokyo-good-news-or-bad-news-political-social-media-messaging-during-the-tokyo-olympics/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230518T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230518T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20230416T022745Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230511T140339Z
UID:957-1684440000-1684443600@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Hiroki Takeuchi (Southern Methodist University)\, Keely McNeme (Southern Methodist University)\, "Comparative One-Party Rule: Japan and Mexico Compared"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: May 18 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: May 19 (Friday)\, 9 – 10 AM \nZoom Registration: Link \nPaper is available here. \nAuthors: Hiroki Takeuchi (Southern Methodist University) and Keely McNeme (Southern Methodist University) \nAbstract:\nA critical aspect of democracies is the peaceful transition of power between multiple parties through fair and free elections. Although a\nparty may remain in power for subsequent terms\, decades of staying in power typically indicate a rigged electoral system. Japan and\nMexico in the twentieth century offer two interesting cases. A single party dominated both for several decades—Japan by the Liberal\nDemocratic Party (LDP) from 1955 to 2009 while Mexico by the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) from 1929 to 2000—but Japan was\nclassified as a democracy while Mexico was classified as authoritarianism. Both the LDP and the PRI were known for electoral\nclientelism and corruption. Given the surface-level similarities of one-party rule between these two countries\, what makes these different\nclassifications? Moreover\, after experiencing the loss of power in the twenty-first century\, the LDP is still the dominant party in Japanese\npolitics\, while the PRI is not in Mexican politics anymore now that both are classified as electoral democracies. What explains the\ndivergent trajectories taken by these two former one-party ruling parties? \nPresenters: Hiroki Takeuchi (Southern Methodist University) and Keely McNeme (Southern Methodist University) \nDiscussants: Masaaki Higashijima (University of Tokyo) and Len Schoppa (University of Virginia) \nChair: Charles Crabtree (Dartmouth College)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/jposs-38-hiroki-takeuchi-southern-methodist-university-comparative-one-party-rule-japan-and-mexico-compared/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230608T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230608T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20230511T174510Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230602T130728Z
UID:998-1686254400-1686258000@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Boyoon Lee (Vanderbilt University)\, "Moderating Role of Country-of-Origin Stereotypes on Attitudes Towards Immigrants"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: June 8 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: June 9 (Friday)\, 9 – 10 AM \nZoom Registration: Link. \nPaper is available here. \nAuthor: Boyoon Lee (Vanderbilt University) \nAbstract: \nHow do country-of-origin stereotypes influence native attitudes towards immigrants? Drawing on dual processing models of stereotypes from social psychology\, I present three different ways that country-of-origin stereotypes might moderate how natives respond to information about immigrants. I use a conjoint experiment in Japan to examine how country-of-origin stereotypes related to competence and warmth\, the two basic dimensions of stereotypes proposed by Fiske et al. (2002)\, condition the way that natives evaluate information about immigrant attributes when deciding their willingness to accept immigrants. I find that while negative country-of-origin stereotypes always reduce the value of these attributes\, there is little evidence that positive stereotypes\, especially as they relate to competence\, have any moderating effect. My findings suggest that negative country-of-origin stereotypes weigh more heavily when natives process information that might affect their preferences for immigrant acceptance. \nPresenter: Boyoon Lee (Vanderbilt University) \nDiscussants: Jeremy Ferwerda (Dartmouth College) and Michael Strausz (Texas Christian University) \nChair: Yusaku Horiuchi (Dartmouth College)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/boyoon-lee-vanderbilt-university-moderating-role-of-country-of-origin-stereotypes-on-attitudes-towards-immigrants/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230720T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230720T211500
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20230705T161635Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230705T162353Z
UID:1033-1689883200-1689887700@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Yusaku Horiuchi (Dartmouth)\, Saori Katada (USC)\, & Megumi Naoi (UCSD)\, "Professionalization Session: Strategies for Teaching Japanese Politics"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: July 20 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9:15 PM\n\n\nJST: July 21 (Friday)\, 9 – 10:15 AM \nZoom Registration: Link. \nGoals:  \nAs part of our professionalization series\, we will discuss strategies to teach about Japan in political science. We will discuss (1) ways to teach about Japan\, as a standalone Japanese politics course\, as a case study in general comparative/IR courses (e.g. electoral politics\, political economy etc.)\, or part of a course focused on a world region (e.g. East Asian politics or IPE); and (2) strategies to engage students at three different levels–undergraduate\, MA\, and PhD–and to encourage and advise them to incorporate Japan in their research. As many of us are creating or revising course syllabi at this time\, we hope this session will be useful for JPOSS participants. \nPresenters: Yusaku Horiuchi (Dartmouth College)\, Saori Katada (University of Southern California)\, Megumi Naoi (University of California\, San Diego)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/yusaku-horiuchi-dartmouth-saori-katada-usc-megumi-naoi-ucsd-professionalization-session-strategies-for-teaching-japanese-politics/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230824T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230824T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20230802T174424Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20230802T174424Z
UID:1070-1692907200-1692910800@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Takaharu Saito (Nagoya University of Commerce and Business)\, "Does Divided Government Control Unilateral Policymaking? Evidence from Chair Elections"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: August 24 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: August 25 (Friday)\, 9 – 10 AM \nZoom Registration: Link. \nPaper is available here. \nAuthor: Takaharu Saito (Nagoya University of Commerce and Business) \nAbstract: \nUnilateral action remains a crucial aspect of presidential policy formulation\, yet empirical consensus on the role of executive-legislative relations remains elusive. In this research\, we applied a Regression Discontinuity (RD) design to scrutinize 4\,898 chairperson elections across 790 municipal governments in Japan\, revealing no substantial influence of executive-legislative dynamics on unilateral action. Consequently\, this study underscores the possibility that the utility of established theories might be contextually confined to specific temporal and geographical realms. \nPresenter: Takaharu Saito (Nagoya University of Commerce and Business) \nDiscussants: Alex Bolton (Emory University) and Charles McClean (Yale University) \nChair: Phillip Lipscy (University of Toronto)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/takaharu-saito-nagoya-university-of-commerce-and-business-does-divided-government-control-unilateral-policymaking-evidence-from-chair-elections/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20231026T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20231026T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20231013T172710Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231016T135336Z
UID:1087-1698350400-1698354000@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Masaru Nishikawa (Tsuda University)\, "Career Trajectory of Political Scientists’ Publication in the First and Second Language: Japan as an example of internationalization of political science\, 1971-2023"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: October 26 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: October 27 (Friday)\, 9 – 10 AM \nZoom Registration: Link. \nPaper is available here. \nAuthors: Akira Matsui (Yokohama National University)\, Masaru Nishikawa (Tsuda University)\, and Daisuke Sakai (Independent Researcher) \nAbstract:\nThis paper discusses the “science of science” and bibliometrics\, which have made new findings on scientific practices\, such as scientific patterns\, scientific impact\, and citation\, but these studies have focused primarily on Western countries. However\, there is little research on non-Western countries\, such as Japan: the existing research is biased towards Western countries. The authors emphasize the need to study the internationalization of political science\, including themes such as international co-authorship. This paper also points out the limitations of major citation databases\, which cover only academic journals published in English. As a result\, the text proposes a case study of Japanese political scientists who incorporate English and Japanese publications into their careers as a unique opportunity to study the internationalization of political science. After a literature review and a research question on how to define the internationalization of political science\, the authors adopt multiple methods –descriptive statistics\, text analysis\, and network analysis — to answer the RQs. \nPresenter: Masaru Nishikawa (Tsuda University) \nDiscussant: Alexander J. Gates (University of Virginia) \nChair: Daniel M. Smith (University of Pennsylvania)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/masaru-nishikawa-tsuda-university-career-trajectory-of-political-scientists-publication-in-the-first-and-second-language-japan-as-an-example-of-internationalization-of-political-science/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20231109T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20231109T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20231018T182146Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231102T132344Z
UID:1093-1699560000-1699563600@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Patricia Maclachlan (University of Texas at Austin)\, "Mechanisms of Resistance: Informal Institutional Impediments to Japanese Postal Privatization"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: November 9 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: November 10 (Friday)\, 10 – 11 AM \nZoom Registration: Link. \nPaper is available here. \nAuthor: Patricia Maclachlan (University of Texas at Austin) \nAbstract:\nNearly two decades after Koizumi Jun’ichirō passed his landmark legislation\, the postal privatization process has lost its momentum. Japan Post Mail is in the red\, the profit margins of the banking and insurance firms are shrinking\, government remains by far the largest shareholder in the two financial firms\, and stories abound of fraud and wasteful spending. Of course\, no reform agenda ever lives up the intentions of its architects. But what exactly explains these developments? One answer\, I argue\, is the impact of enduring informal institutional practices (e.g.\, amakudari and quotas (noruma) for the postmaster’s mobilization of votes) on the privatization process. This paper demonstrates that by functioning as vehicles for anti-reformist elite coordination and competition across the economic\, political\, and bureaucratic domains connected to the postal services\, these unofficial but enduring practices have weakened political momentum behind the privatization agenda and hence the implementation of privatization rules and principles. In addition to presenting new explanations for anti-reformist interest group influence within the Japanese political economy\, this study offers theoretical insights into the nature\, functions\, and significance of informal institutions in “coordinated market economies.” \nPresenter: Patricia Maclachlan (University of Texas at Austin) \nDiscussants: Daniel M. Brinks (University of Texas at Austin) and Steven Vogel (University of California\, Berkeley) \nChair: Amy Catalinac (New York University)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/patricia-maclachlan-university-of-texas-at-austin-mechanisms-of-resistance-informal-institutional-impediments-to-japanese-postal-privatization/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20231207T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20231207T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20231121T155846Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20231127T143041Z
UID:1118-1701979200-1701982800@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Matthew Morris (University of Nottingham)\, "Deindustrialisation and Election Outcomes – Evidence from Japan"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: December 7 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: December 8 (Friday)\, 10 – 11 AM \nZoom Registration: Link \nPaper is available here. \nAuthor: Matthew Morris (University of Nottingham) \nAbstract:\nI investigate the impact of deindustrialisation on election outcomes in Japan over 1983-2012 to expand the economic voting literature eastwards. To causally identify the impact of deindustrialisation I use a Bartik instrument to compute a measure of the exogenous change in local manufacturing employment. At the prefectural level\, greater deindustrialisation leads to (1) an increase in support for nationalist and isolationist parties (2) a decrease in support for the LDP\, and (3) no shift to the right in the electorate. My individual-level analysis of vote choice suggests that such a nationalist reaction may be generationally split\, being most pronounced in the youth and the elderly. \nPresenter: Matthew Morris (University of Nottingham) \nDiscussants: Ko Maeda (University of North Texas) and Stephen Weymouth (Georgetown University)  \nChair: Christina L. Davis (Harvard University)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/matthew-morris/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240201T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240201T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20240116T155950Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240125T191144Z
UID:1146-1706817600-1706821200@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Jiajia Zhou (University of Toronto)\, "Clarifying the Threat of Populism: Place and Party Organizational Strength"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: February 1 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: February 2 (Friday)\, 10 – 11 AM \nZoom Registration: Link \nPaper is available here. \nAuthor: Jiajia Zhou (University of Toronto) \nAbstract:\nIn this paper\, I investigate the relationship between party organizational strength and populist electoral success. I attempt to bridge the gap between micro-level theories of politician strategy and voter demands and macro-level theories of crisis and globalization through an understanding of local party strength and support for populism. I test my hypotheses by examining within-country variation in Japan. I utilize measures for party organizational strength and party-voter linkages in a municipal-level panel dataset that spans more than 1\,000 municipalities and six lower house elections from 2000 to 2014\, two of which occurred during the leadership of an anti-elite populist maverick in Japan’s dominant party. This paper contributes to literature on place-related determinants of populist support and questions existing views of the populist threat as uniquely tied to a particular ideology or the challenges of globalization. More broadly\, the paper aims to bring clarity to questions of a phenomenon that may involve both genuine pursuits of stronger representation and potential threats to democratic stability. \nPresenter: Jiajia Zhou (University of Toronto) \nDiscussants: Paul Kenny (Australian Catholic University) and Charles McClean (Yale University) \nChair: Amy Catalinac (New York University)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/jiajia-zhou-university-of-toronto-clarifying-the-threat-of-populism-place-and-party-organizational-strength/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240328T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240328T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20231211T142801Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240321T195236Z
UID:1130-1711656000-1711659600@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Timothy Cichanowicz (University of Kansas)\, "Friend-Shoring without Decoupling: How Japanese Multinational Corporations Adapt to Political Risk in China"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: March 28 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: March 29 (Friday)\, 9 – 10 AM \nZoom Registration: Link \nPaper is available here. \nAuthor: Timothy Cichanowicz (University of Kansas)\, Samantha A. Vortherms (University of California\, Irvine)\, Jiakun Jack Zhang (University of Kansas). \nAbstract:\nHow are multinational firms (MNCs) and the global supply chains that link them to China adjusting to the heightened political risks in the era of decoupling? Since the U.S.-China Trade War and the Russian Invasion of Ukraine\, Western governments have increased efforts to encourage MNCs to divert investment from an increasingly authoritarian China toward politically reliable allies and partners.\nUsing subsidiary-level panel data on the global operations of Japanese MNCs from 2011-2021\, we reconcile conflicting expectations offered by “business as usual” and “follow the flag” scholars about the degree to which these firms are decoupling or friend-shoring in response to political risks in China. We find that aggregate Japanese investment in China has continued to grow over the past decade despite heightened political risks and a slight decline in the overall share of global subsidiaries based in China\, suggesting that the pace and extent of decoupling are quite limited.\nHowever\, we also find a positive relationship between investment size and the strength of host country security ties at the subsidiary level. This lends support to the idea that alignment of security interests promotes greater investment and that friend-shoring is happening on the margins. \nPresenter: Timothy Cichanowicz (University of Kansas) \nDiscussants: Lee Branstetter (Carnegie Mellon University) and Kristin Vekasi (University of Maine) \nChair: Phillip Lipscy (University of Toronto)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/timothy-cichanowicz/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240411T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240411T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20240216T213850Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240404T183124Z
UID:1162-1712865600-1712869200@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Risa Kitagawa (Northeastern University)\, "Legacies of Wartime Sexual Violence: Evidence from World War II 'Comfort Stations'"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: April 11 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: April 12 (Friday)\, 9 – 10 AM \nZoom Registration: Link \nPaper is available here. \nAuthors: Risa Kitagawa (Northeastern University) and Sumin Lee (Texas A&M University). \nAbstract:\nWhat are the long-term effects of wartime sexual violence on trust? We argue that whereas sexual violence reinforces perceptions of state absence\, it compels affected communities to turn to kinship and social bonds for communal coping\, building social trust over time. We provide evidence from original geocoded data of over 4\,000 “comfort stations” across Asia—the Japanese Imperial Army’s institution of sexual slavery during World War II. Our cross-national and sub-national tests get analytical leverage from prewar railroad networks as a treatment assignment mechanism and the rarity of postwar repatriation of “comfort women.” Proximity to historical “comfort stations” sites consistently predicts a higher likelihood of social trust today\, but not political trust. We document causal mechanisms through historical oral testimonies. Some consequences of wartime sexual violence may follow a distinct logic from broader conflict\, as communities rely on social ties to survive the stigmatized trauma of rape. \nPresenter: Risa Kitagawa (Northeastern University) \nDiscussant: Eun A Jo (Cornell University and University of Notre Dame) \nChair: Daniel M. Smith (University of Pennsylvania)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/risa-kitagawa/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240425T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240425T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20240410T135725Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240426T192013Z
UID:1191-1714075200-1714078800@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Toshiaki Yoshida (Northeastern University)\, "Entangled Fishermen: Fishing Industry and The Evolution of Anti-nuclear Power Plant Movements in Japan"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: April 25 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: April 26 (Friday)\, 9 – 10 AM \nZoom Registration: Link \nPaper is available here. \nAuthor: Toshiaki Yoshida (Northeastern University) \nAbstract:\nWhile Japan has the most advanced nuclear power plant program in the world\, residents have long resisted attempts to site nuclear facilities in their backyards. This article analyzes conditions that have impacted the outcome of these movements since 1960. The analysis of a dataset spanning 32 towns’ movements shows that the existence of capital-intensive fishing was detrimental to movement success. This happened because (1) capital-intensive fishing breeds a dominant boss\, thereby inducing a vertical decision-making process in social movement organizations of key stakeholders; (2) resulting movements led by a single\, salient leader create identifiable targets for pro-nuclear groups; and (3) offshore fishing is susceptible to changes in the external environment\, including the Oil Shock in the 1970s. This study allows us to better understand the relationship between the strength of social movements and the organizational character of key stakeholders. \nPresenter: Toshiaki Yoshida (Northeastern University) \nDiscussant: Phillip Y. Lipscy (University of Toronto) and Pinar Temocin (University of Tokyo) \nChair: Saori Katada (University of Southern California)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/yoshida-4-25-24/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240509T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240509T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20240417T192512Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240502T184614Z
UID:1201-1715284800-1715288400@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Tetsekela Anyiam-Osigwe (Princeton University)\, "Japan and the African Development Bank"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: May 9 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: May 10 (Friday)\, 9 – 10 AM \nZoom Registration: Link \nPaper is available here. \nAuthors: Tetsekela Anyiam-Osigwe (Princeton University) and James Vreeland (Princeton University) \nAbstract:\nAfrica has been a target of influence by major powers throughout history. In this paper\, we investigate sway over Africa’s foremost international financial institution: the African Development Bank (AfDB). We focus on the two largest non-regional shareholders\, the United States and Japan. Analyzing panel data of AfDB loans from 1995-2015\, we find that increases in Japanese bilateral aid and trade\, as well as voting with Japan at the United Nations\, are associated with larger AfDB commitments. We do not uncover similar patterns for the United States. Interview evidence suggests that Japan’s imperial past and lack of historical ties with Africa encourage a quiet yet persuasive engagement with the institution\, which furthers the country’s economic and political aims on the continent. Our results advance the view that historical legacies shape the ways in which countries choose to employ international organizations to pursue their interests. \nPresenter: Tetsekela Anyiam-Osigwe (Princeton University) \nDiscussants: Yusaku Horiuchi (Dartmouth College) and Christopher Kilby (Villanova University) \nChair: Christina Davis (Harvard University)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/anyiam-osigwe-5-9-2024/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240926T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240926T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20240829T180351Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240919T190347Z
UID:1247-1727380800-1727384400@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Harunobu Saijo (Hiroshima University)\, "Legacies of Settler Mortality and Historical Memory in Settlers' Home Regions"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: September 26 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: September 27 (Friday)\, 9 – 10 AM \nZoom Registration: Link \nPaper is available here. \nAuthors: Harunobu Saijo (Hiroshima University) and Xu Jing (Tsinghua University)  \nAbstract:\nPast studies show collective violence exposure can lead to increased hostility or greater tolerance towards outgroups. Victimized groups are often also perpetrators. We propose that balanced framing\, or recognizing victimhood while acknowledging perpetration may be more effective in reducing hostility than either alone. We will test this with the case of Japanese settlers from Nagano Prefecture who faced violence during evacuation from Manchuria with a planned survey of respondents from Nagano. Mainstream narratives in Nagano emphasize both their role as perpetrators and their victimhood. Using an instrumental variables approach\, we will demonstrate that greater exposure to victimization under such dual framing leads contemporary survey respondents to exhibit as yet unmeasured attitudes towards China and other outgroups. Additionally\, treating respondents with balanced framing in a vignette experiment results in as yet unmeasured attitudes towards China and other outgroups\, compared to other framings. \nPresenter: Harunobu Saijo (Hiroshima University) \nDiscussants: Volha Charnysh (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) and Anil Menon (University of California\, Merced) \nChair: Yusaku Horiuchi (Dartmouth College)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/saijo-09-26-2024/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20241010T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20241010T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20240830T200544Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241009T193728Z
UID:1254-1728590400-1728594000@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Kai Zhou (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)\, "Disclosing Invisible Attributes Is Subject to Discrimination: Conjoint Analysis"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: October 10 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: October 11 (Friday)\, 9 – 10 AM \nZoom Registration: Link \nPaper is available here. \nAuthors: Kai Zhou (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) and Yusaku Horiuchi (Dartmouth College) \nAbstract:\nDespite the voluminous literature on discrimination\, there is no empirical research estimating the causal effects of minorities disclosing their invisible identities on others’ discriminatory attitudes. This study investigates the unique case of Zainichi Koreans in Japan\, whose ancestors migrated to Japan before World War II and stayed in Japan afterward with special permanent residency status. They often must choose whether or not to disclose their ethnic identity by using a Korean name called honmyо̄\, or to conceal it and “pass” as Japanese by using a Japanese alias called tsūmei. The use of a Japanese name practically renders their status as ethnic Koreans invisible because they speak Japanese and are assimilated into Japanese society and culture. We perform two conjoint experiments with hypothetical job applicants using ethnic Korean or Japanese names to show Japanese people’s strong discriminatory attitudes against Zainichi Koreans. Importantly\, these discriminatory attitudes are attenuated among those who have frequent and substantive social contact with Zainichi Koreans. We use this particular case to contribute to the broader literature on social contact and discrimination on the basis of invisible identities. Our findings add to a growing body of scholarship providing evidence for invisible forms of discrimination and support for the ability of intergroup social contact to reduce prejudice toward outgroups.  \nPresenter: Kai Zhou (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) \nDiscussant: Kazuko Suzuki (Texas A&M University) \nChair: Phillip Y. Lipscy (University of Toronto)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/zhou-10-10-2024/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20241121T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20241121T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20241024T191211Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241031T152324Z
UID:1286-1732219200-1732222800@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Japan Decides 2024: A Preliminary Analysis of the Japanese General Election
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: November 21 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \n\n\n\nJST: November 22 (Friday)\, 10 – 11 AM \nZoom Registration: Link \nPresenters: Ko Maeda (University of North Texas)\, Tetsuya Matsubayashi (Osaka University)\, and Kenneth Mori McElwain (University of Tokyo) \nChair: Amy Catalinac (New York University) \nPlease join us to discuss the preliminary findings of Japan’s House of Representatives election on October 27\, 2024\, with the co-editors and a few chapter authors of the forthcoming Japan Decides 2024.
URL:https://jposs.org/event/japan-decides-2024/
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20250227T200000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20250227T210000
DTSTAMP:20260403T190205
CREATED:20250211T212313Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250219T142943Z
UID:1312-1740686400-1740690000@jposs.org
SUMMARY:Masanori Kikuchi (Washington University in St. Louis)\, "Legacies of Atomic Bombings on Foreign Policy Attitudes in Japan"
DESCRIPTION:U.S. ET: February 27 (Thursday)\, 8 – 9 PM \nJST: February 28 (Friday)\, 10 – 11 AM \nZoom Registration: Link \nPaper is available here. \nAuthors: Masanori Kikuchi (Washington University in St. Louis) \nAbstract:\nWhat are the consequences of extreme violence during inter-state war on citizens’ long-term political attitudes and values? While scholars have identified prolonged effects of violence exposure on public opinion towards in-group and out-group members\, we understand less about how violence shapes broader views about war itself. I theorize that victimization from large-scale violence can have a lasting effect on\nsupport for citizens’ dovish foreign policy views\, as it leads them to view war itself as immoral\, and that these beliefs are passed down to subsequent generations through various familial-\, community-\, and national-level channels. Focusing on the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II as a key case\, I conducted an original survey across contemporary Japan to examine the expectations. The analysis provides robust evidence that individuals with channels to the victimized communities strongly oppose nuclear weapons\, hold dovish foreign policy views\, and see war as immoral. The findings highlight how traumatic wartime violence shapes long-term foreign policy attitudes\, showcasing both the influence and limitations of family and community in transmitting political attitudes across generations.  \nPresenter: Masanori Kikuchi (Washington University in St. Louis) \nDiscussants: James Dongjin Kim (University of Washington) and Atsushi Yamagishi (Hitotsubashi University) \nChair: Saori Katada (University of Southern California)
URL:https://jposs.org/event/kikuchi-02-27-2025/
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR